Most sales people like to talk. So do a lot of hiring managers, which is unfortunate when it comes to hiring sales people because assessing the abilities of a potential hire is difficult if
they aren’t the ones doing the talking.
Get Them to Speak
While there is a tendency for many hiring managers to do a lot of talking, particularly sales people, people who like to sell, and business owners that want to promote the career opportunity and or describe their company, interviewing sales people is a lot like peeling an onion to get to the lower layers – where the truth lies – so it is paramount that the sales person being interviewed is given the majority of the speaking time and the biggest opportunity to share information about themselves.
Asking the right questions is a big part of obtaining the right information, but many job seekers have well practiced responses to the most common sales interview questions, so it takes another tactic to effectively gather the truth from the interviewee. That tactic is using silence.
Silence is one of the most powerful techniques or gaining insight on a person in a sales interview because most people, even sales people, feel compelled to fill dead air with words.
Often in sales interviews I will ask a question to a candidate and then wait for the answer. When the candidate provides what they think is an appropriate answer, I remain silent. I don’t offer any reaction. I simply remain quiet, which usually prompts the interviewee to think that I am expecting a longer answer and 9 times out of 10 they start talking again. In some cases, they repeat themselves, but in many cases, they give additional details and new information. I will remain silent until I feel like there is no new information to be garnered and then advance with my other questions.
Remarkably the additional answers often contradict earlier statements – a sign that the candidate provided their stock answer at first and then became more candid once they went “off-script.”
Using silence in an interview might take a bit of practice, because it may well require no words and a poker face for more than 5 seconds which will feel like an eternity. It will likely feel awkward, but the discomfort is mitigated if one knows this will be the case and can brace themselves accordingly.
It does work and the additional insight it provides is invaluable in assessing whether a sales candidate has or doesn’t have the ability to perform in a sales role.
To your success!
Image courtesy of nongpimmy | freedigitalphotos.net
relpost-thumb-wrapper
Related posts
close relpost-thumb-wrapper
Eliot Burdett
He co-authored Sales Recruiting 2.0, How to Find Top Performing Sales People, Fast and provides regular insights on sales team management and hiring on the Peak Sales Recruiting Blog.
Latest posts by Eliot Burdett (see all)
- 20 Of Our Favorite Books About Sales Management and Sales Leadership – October 20, 2023
- How To Make Progress On Your Sales Goal Without A Sales Leader – September 15, 2021
- Augment Your Recruiting Strategy During “The Great Resignation” – July 26, 2021
Building strong, stable and reliable sales teams is critical to sales performance, certainly in the long term. Sales rep turnover affects sales production, team morale, customer loyalty and ultimately, the bottom line, so it is incumbent on executive leadership to reduce or avoid unwanted turnover in the sales force. Here are 5 ways to reduce turnover in your sales department.
Recently I wrapped up a consulting assignment for the VP of one the country’s leading enterprise software companies. During that time, I was around the elite level sales people on his team and I got to thinking about the differences between sales forces that consistently perform at a high level and those that are consistently average. One of the key differences is the language used by top producing sales teams.
When a hiring manager meets what appears to be a perennial top producing sales person, there can be an overwhelming temptation to go into full sales mode to get this person hired – especially if this person is working somewhere else which is almost always the case with top performing sales people (we call these passive candidates as they are not actively job seeking). There tends to be a hesitance to ask the tough assessment questions that would be asked of other less accomplished candidates, for fear of turning the great candidate away.
Many sales managers, particularly new sales managers, have trouble striking the right balance between managing reps and letting them do their jobs. Too often there is micromanagement and not enough of the right kind of management.
Often times employers will approach Peak with a desire to hire sales people with very specific sales experience, who in theory will leverage this experience to produce superior sales. The approach makes a sense in theory and would be a convenient way to identify superior sales people but hiring based on experience seldom works in practice.
Spiffs represent a method of incentivizing certain kinds of sales rep behaviors and outcomes. Also known as a Sales Performance Incentive Fund, the Spiff is a concept dating back to as early as the mid 1800s and used by manufacturers as sort of kickback program to retailers that sell higher volumes of certain product lines. Since then, the concept evolved into very popular sales performance tool within sales teams.
During a coaching call with a CEO yesterday, I was asked for my thoughts on some of the best ways to get sales reps to perform. We discussed the elements of effective sales management from strategy, goal setting, communication, coaching and training. Amongst these tactics, holding reps accountable is arguably the most powerful tool for getting reps to perform.